Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124826›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine

Knowledge, Attitude, And Practices of The Educated Women of North India Toward Cervical Cancer.

Ishita Miglani, Urvashi Gandhi, Poonam Laul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ishita MiglaniMaulana Azad Medical College, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India.
Urvashi GandhiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Hospital, Hari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Poonam LaulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Hospital, Hari Nagar, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a largely preventable disease that claimed the lives of more than 300 000 women in 2018. Hesitation to adopt cervical cancer screening strategies motivated us to find out the knowledge gaps and attitudes of the educated section toward these practices. An in-depth knowledge of this aspect will help us comprehend the barriers that are deterring women from accepting these practices. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from November 1, 2021, to November 30, 2021, to assess the public knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cervical cancer. The self-designed online questionnaire was shared on social media such as Telegram, WhatsApp, LinkedIn, and Facebook. Girls and women aged 15 years and more studying in educational institutions or those who have completed their graduation were asked to fill out the questionnaire if willing to do so anonymously. 824 respondents filled out the online survey. 75% of the respondents had good knowledge about pap smear and HPV vaccination. Only 80 respondents (9.7%) were vaccinated against HPV. 255 (30.9%) had been screened with a pap smear at least once in their lifetime. Screening with pap smear was never performed in 412 subjects, which constituted 50% of the respondents. A poor knowledge about the eligibility of pap smear and the availability of HPV as a screening modality may have contributed to a poor conversion to the regular practice of screening modalities. Awareness drives need to focus on these issues.

Indexed as

Attitudecervical cancerknowledgeonline surveypap smearpractices

Identifiers

PMID40124826
PMCPMC11927845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.