ArticleTrauma case reports2025
Knee arthrodesis with modular megaprosthesis as salvage procedure for the limb following in a patient with an infected knee tumor prosthesis: A case report.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The management of periprosthetic knee infections is a complex event, especially in the context of megaprostheses. An accepted option in these cases is knee arthrodesis, aiming to salvage the limb with acceptable and pain-free functionality. We present a successful case of knee arthrodesis using a hybrid model of modular nail-prosthesis in a patient with massive bone stock loss following the removal of an infected tumor-type prosthesis. Case presentation: A 65-year-old male patient with a chronic periprosthetic infection related to a resection prosthesis implanted 5 years earlier, experiencing knee stiffness and presenting a massive bone stock deficit after prosthesis removal. Initial management involved an osteo-cement spacer and antibiotics, along with a transarticular external fixator. Subsequently, knee arthrodesis was performed using a hybrid model of modular nail-prosthesis, coupled with targeted antibiotic treatment. The arthrodesis was deemed successful, with a pain-free limb and no signs of infection recurrence at the 52-month follow-up. Conclusion: In the scenario of infection and massive bone stock deficit, knee arthrodesis using intramedullary devices such as nails, megaprostheses, or hybrids is an alternative that can be successful if accompanied by appropriate medical-surgical management of the infection. This approach allows for earlier functional recovery compared to other techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.