ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2025
Functional outcomes of peroneus longus tendon autograft for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis.
Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Broader perspective on the role of peroneus longus tendon in ligament reconstruction.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is vital for regulating posterior tibial translation in relation to the femur, which is critical for knee stability. PCL tears are infrequently isolated in knee injuries; however, the absence of the PCL results in abnormal knee kinematics, which may cause injuries to other ligaments. The ideal tendon source for PCL reconstruction is still a subject of debate.
aimTo evaluate the results of employing the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) in PCL reconstruction.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials and retrospective observational studies discussing the outcomes of using the PLT for PCL reconstruction. Studies published up to August 2024 were searched across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Full texts of the selected articles were retrieved, reviewed, and independently assessed by the investigators. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus, with any remaining disagreements being arbitrated by a third author.
resultsThis meta-analysis included five studies on PLT use for PCL reconstruction: (1) Four prospective studies with 104 patients; and (2) One retrospective study with 18 patients. Most studies followed up participants for 24 months, while one had a shorter follow-up of 18 months. Lysholm and modified cincinnati scores improved by pooled means of 32.2 (95%CI: 29.3-35.1,
conclusionEvidence supports PLT autografts for PCL reconstruction, improving knee function and patient outcomes. Larger randomized trials are needed to confirm efficacy and compare graft options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.