Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124723›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2025

Denosumab regimens in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Bruno G Barreto, Claudio Santili, Alex Guedes, Fernando D Moreira, Claudio Luiz Dsl Paz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bruno G BarretoDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Aristides Maltez, Salvador 40285-001, Bahia, Brazil.
Claudio SantiliDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo 01221-020, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alex GuedesDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Santa Izabel, Salvador 40050-410, Bahia, Brazil.
Fernando D MoreiraDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Santa Izabel, Salvador 40050-410, Bahia, Brazil.
Claudio Luiz Dsl PazInstituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador 40000-000, Bahia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm that should be treated surgically, whenever possible. This treatment approach may be linked with greater morbidity besides functional impairment. Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody. Its administration inhibits bone resorption and has become part of the therapeutic armamentarium against GCTB, as it allows local control with a view to downstaging for a more conservative surgical procedure. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal denosumab regimen for GCTB. Therefore, a wide discussion of denosumab regimen is necessary.

aimTo assess the effectiveness of various therapy protocols employing denosumab in individuals with GCTB.

methodsA broad and systematic literature search was carried out using the PRISMA guidelines. We analyzed studies that reported skeletally mature patients with GCTB regardless of sex or ethnicity treated with denosumab. Articles with fewer than five patients and in languages except Spanish, Portuguese and English were excluded. Statistical analysis with proportion meta-analysis was performed due to the dichotomous nature of the data.

results1005 articles were screened, of which 26 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected, totaling 1742 patients, 51.8% women and 48.2% men, with an average of 35 years of age. Treatment with denosumab was associated with high rates of clinical benefit (CB) and imaging response (IR), without changing local recurrence rates when compared to patients treated without denosumab, regardless of the therapeutic regimen adopted and the number of doses applied. The adverse events (AE) presented were mostly mild, with the exception of a malignant transformation to osteosarcoma.

conclusionTreatment of GCTB with denosumab is effective, showing high rates of CB and IR. The AE that occurred were mostly mild. We found no differences between the articles considering the researched outcomes regardless of the therapeutic regimen adopted.

Indexed as

Bone neoplasmsDenosumabGiant cell tumor of boneOutcome assessment health careSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40124723
PMCPMC11924024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.