Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124704›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2025

BrainNeXt: novel lightweight CNN model for the automated detection of brain disorders using MRI images.

Melahat Poyraz, Ahmet Kursad Poyraz, Yusuf Dogan, Selva Gunes, Hasan S Mir, Jose Kunnel Paul, Prabal Datta Barua, Mehmet Baygin, Sengul Dogan, Turker Tuncer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Melahat PoyrazDepartment of Radiology, Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital, Elazig, Turkey.
Ahmet Kursad PoyrazDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey.
Yusuf DoganDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey.
Selva GunesDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey.
Hasan S MirDepartment of Electrical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
Jose Kunnel PaulDepartment of Neurology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala India.
Prabal Datta BaruaSchool of Business (Information System), University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia.
Mehmet BayginDepartment of Computer Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Sengul DoganDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9677-5684
Turker TuncerDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Filippo MolinariDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico Di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Rajendra AcharyaSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to propose a novel convolutional neural network, named BrainNeXt, for the automated brain disorders detection using magnetic resonance images (MRI) images. Furthermore, we aim to investigate the performance of our proposed network on various medical applications. To achieve high/robust image classification performance, we gathered a new MRI dataset belonging to four classes: (1) Alzheimer's disease, (2) chronic ischemia, (3) multiple sclerosis, and (4) control. Inspired by ConvNeXt, we designed BrainNeXt as a lightweight classification model by incorporating the structural elements of the Swin Transformers Tiny model. By training our model on the collected dataset, a pretrained BrainNeXt model was obtained. Additionally, we have suggested a feature engineering (FE) approach based on the pretrained BrainNeXt, which extracted features from fixed-sized patches. To select the most discriminative/informative features, we employed the neighborhood component analysis selector in the feature selection phase. As the classifier for our patch-based FE approach, we utilized the support vector machine classifier. Our recommended BrainNeXt approach achieved an accuracy of 100% and 91.35% for training and validation. The recommended model obtained the test classification accuracy of 94.21%. To further improve the classification performance, we suggested a patch-based DFE approach, which achieved a test accuracy of 99.73%. The obtained results, surpassing 90% accuracy on the test dataset, demonstrate the effectiveness and high classification performance of the proposed models.

Indexed as

BrainNeXtDeep feature engineeringINCAMRI dataset

Identifiers

PMID40124704
PMCPMC11929658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.