ArticleBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2025
Effect of mouth rinses on roughness and optical properties of restorative materials for oral rehabilitation.
Article in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of pediatric drugs on the surface roughness of primary enamel and restorative materials: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Impact of Various Mouthwashes on the Color Stability of Hybrid Ceramic and Reinforced Composite CAD/CAM Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Surface and Mechanical Behavior of 3D-Printed PMMA After Accelerated and Chemical Aging Under Simulated Oral Conditions.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of mouth rinses on the roughness and optical properties of three polymeric restorative materials. Cylinders were obtained from Ivotion Dent, Ivotion Base, and Empress Direct. Nano-hybrid composite teeth were also investigated (SR Phonares II). Specimens were divided into four subgroups for mouth rinsing simulation according to the mouth rinse: (1) Distilled water; (2) Soft-Tissue; (3) Implants/Cosmetic; and (4) PerioGard. Roughness (Ra) and optical properties were evaluated before and at timepoints during mouth rinsing simulation. Roughness increased after rinsing simulation for Ivotion Dent and Ivotion Base after all mouth rinses. Soft-Tissue and Cosmetic increased the Ra of Empress Direct. Translucency parameter (TP) of Ivotion Dent and Empress Direct increased, while Contrast ratio (CR) values decreased after rinsing simulation, regardless of the solution used. Ivotion Base demonstrated higher TP after rinsing with Soft-Tissue and Implants mouth rinses compared to the control group, while no difference among them was observed for CR. The mouth rinses affected the roughness and optical properties of materials differently after the rinsing simulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.