ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Development and validation of a dynamic nomogram for acute kidney injury prediction in ICU patients with acute heart failure.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Internal Validation of a Web-Based Dynamic Nomogram for Dynamic Risk Stratification of Early Bacterial Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients.Annals of transplantation · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Model for Predicting Postoperative Hyperlactatemia in Young Children Following Congenital Heart Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Acute kidney injury after myocardial infarction: prognostic implications via dual robust methods.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Developing and validating a simple and clinically useful dynamic nomogram for predicting early acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: Clinical data from patients with AHF were obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. The patients with AHF were randomly allocated into derivation and validation sets. The independent predictors for AKI development in AHF patients were identified through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A nomogram was developed based on the results of the multivariable logistic regression to predict early AKI onset in AHF patients, which was subsequently implemented as a web-based calculator for clinical application. An evaluation of the nomogram was conducted using discrimination, calibration curves, and decision curve analyses (DCA). Results: After strict screening, 1,338 patients with AHF were included in the derivation set, and 3,129 in the validation set. Sepsis, use of human albumin, age, mechanical ventilation, aminoglycoside administration, and serum creatinine levels were identified as predictive factors for AKI in patients with AHF. The discrimination of the nomogram in both the derivation and validation sets was 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.83) and 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.83). Additionally, the calibration curve demonstrated that the predicted outcomes aligned well with the actual observations. Ultimately, the DCA curves indicated that the nomogram exhibited favorable clinical applicability. Conclusion: The nomogram that integrates clinical risk factors and enables the personalized prediction of AKI in patients with AHF upon admission to the ICU, which has the potential to assist in identifying AHF patients who would derive the greatest benefit from interventions aimed at preventing and treating AKI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.