ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Subjective and objective changes in visual quality after implantable collamer lens implantation for myopia.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of three-dimensional surgical system versus binocular microscope for implantable Collamer lens implantation: a randomized clinical trial.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Research progress on postoperative higher-order aberrations after ICL implantation: patterns of change, influencing factors, and associated visual disturbances.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Real-World Safety Profile of EVO and EVO+ Implantable Collamer Lenses: A Retrospective Study Based on FDA Surveillance Data.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Current and emerging strategies for myopia control: a narrative review of optical, pharmacological, behavioural, and adjunctive therapies.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Correlation between binocular vision function and visual fatigue in school-age children with myopic anisometropia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Editorial: Enhancing patient outcomes after cataract, corneal and refractive surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Explainable AI for time series prediction in economic mental health analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Sirius Cutting Mode enhances vision and reduces myopia severity through personalized treatment.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the wide application of implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery for myopia correction, the range of refractive correction has expanded (up to -18.00 D for myopia), and the safety, effectiveness, predictability and stability of ICLs have been well documented. However, achieving good visual quality after ICL implantation has also become very important. This article systematically reviews objective and subjective visual quality after ICL surgery. First, parameters used to assess objective visual quality after ICL surgery are introduced, including higher-order aberrations, the modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff (cycles per degree [cpd]), the Strehl 2D ratio (SR), and the objective scatter index (OSI). Notably, various post-operative objective visual quality measurements have been improving over time. However, halos and glare caused by ICL implantation are notable postoperative complications. In further discussions, we also focus on factors that can affect visual quality, such as ICL position changes, pupil size, and the ICL optical zone. Furthermore, measures to improve postoperative visual quality, such as the selection of the surgical incision and mode, are provided. This review explores the potential mechanisms, emphasizes the importance of pre- and postoperative measures, and provides guidance for good postoperative visual quality. Additionally, this review aims to address the factors influencing visual quality and postoperative outcomes to optimize vision after ICL implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.