ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Psychological distress in newly diagnosed patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A scoping review.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Body Mass Index and Depressive Symptom Trajectories Among Chinese Middle and Old Aged Adults: A Cohort Analysis Based on the CHARLS.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Scoping Review of Patient-Centered Outcomes in Gastrointestinal Cancer Care.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Relationship of pre-diagnosis pharmacist continuity with patient-reported satisfaction at the first post-diagnosis community pharmacy visit among adolescents and young adults with cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional online survey.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- Patient perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence to support treatment decision making in renal cancer: findings from the KATY project.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Network analysis of distress, symptom burden, social support, and digital health literacy in older postoperative patients with gastric cancer.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Impact of multi-channel follow-up as continuous nursing on cancer pain control, adverse reactions, and quality of life in patients with digestive tract tumors: a controlled study of 136 cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help among patients with colorectal cancer: A latent profile analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- The impact of death literacy on self-management behaviors in gastric cancer patients: the chain mediating role of psychological adaptation and cognitive reappraisal.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Psychosocial distress in outpatients with cancer: influence of demographic and medical factors on psychosocial distress and the perceived need of psycho-oncological support.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: A cancer diagnosis often triggers significant emotional and psychological challenges, underscoring the importance of addressing psychological distress. While psychological distress in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer has been widely studied, less attention has been focused on those who are newly diagnosed. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on psychological distress in newly diagnosed patients with GI cancer. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. The last search was carried out on September 23, 2024, across PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and PsychINFO for literature published between January 2013 and September 2024. The search terms included "newly diagnosed," "distress," "patients," and "gastrointestinal cancer." A meta-analysis was conducted using the R package to synthesize the prevalence of psychological distress across studies, with a random-effects model applied to account for heterogeneity. Results: Fifteen studies were included in the analysis, revealing an average prevalence of psychological distress of 28.1% (99% CI: 181.84, 433.39). Psychological distress was most prevalent during the diagnostic phase and gradually decreased over time. Factors such as older age, advanced cancer stage, poor performance status, and a lack of social support contributed to increased psychological distress. Additionally, only 20% of the studies were intervention-based. Conclusions: Approximately one-third of newly diagnosed patients with GI cancer may experience psychological distress. Early identification and intervention to address this distress before treatment initiation are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Systematic review registration: osf.io/n2796.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.