ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Establishment and validation of post-PCI nomogram in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A clinical nomogram for predicting major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in elderly Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: development and validation in a real-world cohort.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2025Article
- Predicting cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: a nomogram approach.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to create and validate a clinical prediction model for the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within one year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods: The study will use 70% of the 738 patients for model training and the remaining 30% for model validation. The feature recursive elimination algorithm (RFE) and the least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) regression technique will be used to identify the best combination of features. We compare the clinical prediction model we constructed with GRACE in terms of discrimination, calibration, recall, and clinical impact. Results: We used the RFE and LASSO regression technique to select 8 key variables from 44 candidates for our predictive model. The predictive model was found to have a good fit based on the Hosmer-Lemeshow test results ( Conclusion: This model assists in the early identification of the risk of MACE within one year after PCI for ACS in elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.