Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124602›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Multiplex

Eduard Mas-Carrió, Judith Schneider, Victor Othenin-Girard, Romain Pigeault, Pierre Taberlet, Philippe Christe, Olivier Glaizot, Luca Fumagalli

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eduard Mas-CarrióLaboratory for Conservation Biology, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Judith SchneiderLaboratory for Conservation Biology, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Victor Othenin-GirardLaboratory for Conservation Biology, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Romain PigeaultDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pierre TaberletCNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Philippe ChristeDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olivier GlaizotDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Luca FumagalliLaboratory for Conservation Biology, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection and identification of vector-host-parasite systems are key to understanding their evolutionary dynamics and to design effective disease prevention strategies. Traditionally, microscopical and serological techniques were employed to analyse arthropod blood meals for host/parasite detection, but these were limited in taxonomic resolution and only to pre-selected taxa. In recent years, molecular techniques have emerged as a promising alternative, offering enhanced resolution and taxonomic range. While singleplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were used at first to identify host, vector and parasite components in separate reactions, today multiple primer pairs can be combined in a single reaction,

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicMalaria, AvianMosquito VectorsMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsBlood mealsDNA metabarcodingHostMosquitoParasitePlasmodium infectionVectorVector-borne disease

Identifiers

PMID40124602
PMCPMC11927560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.