ArticleTherapeutic advances in reproductive health
Rationalization, facilitators, and impediments of fertility transition in Ethiopia: qualitative exploration of the community readiness, willingness, and ability.
Article in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macro-level facilitators and impediments to fertility transition in Ethiopia: implications for reorienting family planning towards sustainable development.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High fertility and rapid population growth can threaten human development and increase risks to maternal and child health. The diffusion of the benefits of lower fertility requires readiness to plan, and willingness and ability to adopt and use family planning measures. Objective: This assessment aimed to explore the readiness, willingness, and ability (RWA) among selected Ethiopian communities, and identify the facilitators and impediments of fertility transition. Design: This exploratory phenomenological qualitative study collects data from purposefully selected community members and experts in Addis Ababa, Arbaminch, and Jigjiga. Method: The analysis follows deductive coding and a thematic presentation of findings under the RWA domains. Readiness deals with four themes: (1) the rationalization of the value of children, (2) recognition of the burden of high-risk fertility, (3) readiness to define the ideal number of children, and (4) socio-cultural norms about family size. Willingness contains three themes: (1) the psychosocial legitimacy of contraceptives, (2) the religious legitimacy of contraceptives, and (3) women's power to cope with barriers to family planning. The ability domain contains (1) women's knowledge about contraception and (2) access to and utilization of contraceptives. Results: The communities involved in this study recognized the burden of high-risk fertility behaviors (early-age fertility, and frequent and many births), but they prefer large family sizes. Consequently, they exhibit good family planning willingness and practice for birth spacing but not for birth limitation. Recognizing the socio-economic burden of high-risk fertility, accepting and using contraceptives for the health of mothers and children are possible facilitators of fertility transition. Conversely, the desire for high parity, husbands and religious disapproval of contraceptives, side effects of contraceptives, and limited access to method mix are possible impediments. Conclusion: The RWA to space births are adequately diffused and adopted by the community, but birth limitation is not yet recognized. Beyond promoting birth spacing, Ethiopia's fertility transition requires a shift in societal values from large to small family size. Overcoming barriers to contraceptive use also requires tailored efforts to improve the availability of method mix and involve male and religious leaders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.