Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124579›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2025

Efficacy of omalizumab after discontinuation: a retrospective single-center observational study in children with severe asthma.

Simone Foti Randazzese, Cecilia Lugarà, Francesca Galletta, Giovanni Pioggia, Giuseppe Crisafulli, Lucia Caminiti, Sebastiano Gangemi, Paolo Ruggeri, Sara Manti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simone Foti Randazzese *Pediatric Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Cecilia Lugarà *Pediatric Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Francesca GallettaPediatric Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giovanni PioggiaInstitute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Messina, Italy.
Giuseppe CrisafulliPediatric Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Lucia CaminitiPediatric Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Sebastiano GangemiSchool and Operative Unit of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Paolo RuggeriPulmonology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences (BIOMORF), University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Sara MantiPediatric Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Several trials documented safety and efficacy of omalizumab, but there are a few data about its effects after discontinuation. This study aims to evaluate the maintenance of efficacy of omalizumab in pediatric asthmatic patients one year after its suspension. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 17 subjects aged 6-18 years, divided into two groups: Group A (9 patients) who discontinued omalizumab after 18 months, and Group B (8 patients) who continued the therapy. Data on respiratory function (FEV1%), the number of exacerbations, need for hospitalizations, use of oral corticosteroids, and Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores were collected and analyzed at three time points: baseline (T0), after 18 months of treatment (T1), and 36 months (T2). Results: In Group A, significant differences were observed between T0 and T1, and T1 and T2, in FEV1% values, the number of exacerbations, the need for oral corticosteroids, and ACT scores. Group B showed significant differences in these parameters over time, with a notable reduction in exacerbations and improvement in ACT scores. The comparative analysis revealed that Group B had a higher number of exacerbations compared to Group A at T0 and greater use of oral cortico-steroids at T1. By T2, Group A had a higher ACT score than Group B at T0, whereas Group B showed higher ACT scores at T2 compared to Group A. Discussion: The study confirmed the efficacy and safety of omalizumab, with its benefits persisting one year after treatment discontinuation in terms of lung function, reduction in exacerbations, decreased need for oral corticosteroids, and improved quality of life. Further research is necessary.

Indexed as

childrendiscontinuationomalizumabpersistence of efficacysevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID40124579
PMCPMC11925863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.