ArticleiScience2025
Predictable sequential structure augments auditory sensitivity at threshold.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human hearing is highly sensitive and allows us to detect acoustic events at low levels. However, sensitivity is not only a function of the integrity of cochlear transduction mechanisms but is also constrained by central processes such as attention and expectation. While the effects of distraction and attentional orienting are generally acknowledged, the extent to which probabilistic expectations influence sensitivity at threshold is not clear. Classical audiometric tests, commonly used to assess hearing thresholds, do not distinguish between bottom-up sensitivity and top-down processes. In this study, we aim to decipher the influence of various types of expectations on hearing thresholds and how this information can be used to improve the assessment of hearing sensitivity. Our results raise important questions regarding the conventional assessment of hearing thresholds, both in fundamental research and in audiological clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.