Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124506›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Learning-augmented sketching offers improved performance for privacy preserving and secure GWAS.

Junyan Xu, Kaiyuan Zhu, Jieling Cai, Can Kockan, Natnatee Dokmai, Hyunghoon Cho, David P Woodruff, S Cenk Sahinalp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Junyan XuCancer Data Science Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kaiyuan ZhuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jieling CaiDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Can KockanBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Natnatee DokmaiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Hyunghoon ChoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
David P WoodruffDepartment of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
S Cenk SahinalpCancer Data Science Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trusted execution environments (TEEs), such as Intel SGX, enable secure, privacy-preserving computations but may have computational resource constraints. To address this, methods like SkSES use sketching for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) across distributed datasets while maintaining privacy. Here, we present a learning-augmented version of SkSES for more accurate identification of significant SNPs. Our method first conducts GWAS on a public training dataset to locally identify significant SNPs. These SNPs are assigned dedicated memory to enable more precise selection of significant SNPs over the entire dataset while optimizing memory usage. Our method maintains the stringent privacy guarantees of SkSES, ensuring sensitive genotype data remains undisclosed to other institutions or cloud providers. Experimental results on benchmark datasets show the learning-augmented version achieves up to 40% higher accuracy compared to the original SkSES under identical memory constraints. This advancement improves the scalability and effectiveness of collaborative GWAS studies in TEEs.

Indexed as

GeneticsHealth technology

Identifiers

PMID40124506
PMCPMC11927738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.