ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
Patients' and gastroenterologists' preferences regarding outcomes and medication attributes in ulcerative colitis.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Timing of ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: A survey of the patient perspective in the 'biological' era.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients' and gastroenterologists' views on the relative importance of treatment outcomes and medication attributes for ulcerative colitis (UC) may differ. We aimed to explore which treatment outcomes and medication attributes are considered important by both for therapeutic decisions. Methods: Eight gastroenterologists and 23 patients with UC in Greece participated in semi-structured interviews and focus groups, respectively. The focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and coded, utilizing thematic analysis until data saturation was achieved. Results: Themes that were discussed included the impact of UC on daily life, UC-related outcomes, drug-related attributes and the patient-doctor relationship. Within these themes, disparities between the perspectives of gastroenterologists and patients were evident on 2 main issues. Gastroenterologists prioritized clinical remission and emphasized long-term objectives, such as mucosal healing, while patients focused on shorter-term outcomes, such as the early and sustained relief of symptoms. Regarding medication attributes, important factors for patients were primarily those that impacted their daily life, such as route of administration, dosage and the need for hospital visits. In contrast, gastroenterologists were more concerned about potential adverse events and non-responsiveness to treatment. There was a consensus regarding the importance of shared decision-making for UC management, emphasized by both patients and clinicians. Conclusions: Gastroenterologists mostly prioritize objective measures of remission, while patients mainly focus on factors related to their quality of life and overall well-being. Enhancing communication regarding different goals and expectations may strengthen the physician-patient relationship, ultimately resulting in better shared therapeutic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.