Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124300›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

A dataset for mapping the Japanese drugs to RxNorm standard concepts.

Eizen Kimura, Yukinobu Kawakami, Shingo Inoue, Ai Okajima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eizen KimuraDepartment of Medical Informatics, Medical School of Ehime University, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Yukinobu KawakamiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Medical School of Ehime University, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Shingo InoueYuimedi Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
Ai OkajimaYuimedi Inc., Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) is an international research community dedicated to large-scale observational studies using real-world healthcare data. Participation in OHDSI requires mapping local terminology systems to the OHDSI Standard Vocabulary (OSV) and transforming healthcare data into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP CDM), a standardized database schema. Adherence to the OSV and CDM enables the integration of datasets from different countries and regions, facilitating international cross-sectional analyses and supporting the discovery of large-scale evidence and new medical knowledge. Despite the globally recognized healthcare technology and systems excellence in Japan, Japanese real-world data (RWD) remain underutilized in international research. This is primarily due to reliance on domestically managed controlled terminologies in Japan that are not aligned with international controlled terminologies such as SNOMED CT, making mapping Japanese RWD to the CDM challenging. In addition, the wide variety of pharmaceutical products in Japan has hindered the establishment of mappings to RxNorm, the standardized drug terminology used in OHDSI. Previously, we used a Large Language Model (LLM) to map Japanese pharmaceutical data to RxNorm. A sampling-based evaluation confirmed that the LLM could accurately identify mapping candidates. Pharmacists and a medical informatics researcher validated these mappings, resulting in an ingredient-based mapping of Japanese pharmaceutical terms to RxNorm. Researchers interested in pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, and drug-related clinical decision support systems integrated with Japanese RWD can benefit significantly from this dataset. It also contains information about the target drugs, their translated names, LLM-generated suggestions, and reference data, making it suitable for developing and validating natural language processing and machine learning techniques for terminology mapping.

Indexed as

Controlled terminologyDrug databaseMachine learningRxNorm

Identifiers

PMID40124300
PMCPMC11926709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.