ArticleJB & JS open access
Impact of Flatback Deformity and Stiff Spinopelvic Mobility on 3-Dimensional Pelvic and Hip Kinematics After Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Narrative Review of Spinopelvic Alignment Changes After Total Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Flatback Deformity and Stiff Pelvic Mobility Alter the Optimal Cup Anteversion After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Insights from 3D-to-2D Model-Image Registration Analysis.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinopelvic abnormalities have been reported to be a risk factor for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to compare the kinematics of the pelvis and hip joints in patients with and without spinopelvic abnormalities after THA and to elucidate dynamic forward-leaning movement during chair-rising, which are not detectable through static radiographs. Methods: This case series included 108 hips that underwent dynamic anteroposterior radiographic imaging of the sit-to-stand motion after THA. The average age at surgery was 68 ± 10 years, with 95 hips (88%) in women (average body mass index, 23.5 ± 3.2 kg/m Results: Flatback deformity was present in 45 hips (42%) and stiff spinopelvic mobility (SPM) in 35 hips (32%), with both deformities present in 21 hips (19%). The pelvis was consistently significantly posteriorly tilted in the flatback deformity group throughout the movement compared with the normal group, with the greatest difference observed in the standing position. The hip flexion angles in the flatback deformity group showed significant extension in the standing position (7° greater than that in the normal group). For stiff SPM, a significant posterior tilt in the standing position was observed. Accordingly, the range between the maximum hip flexion and extension was 13° greater. There was no significant difference between the maximal flexion and extension centers. Conclusions: Patients with flatback deformities consistently exhibited posterior APPa, especially when standing. In stiff SPM, a large range of hip flexion and extension while chair-rising increased the risk of impingement, indicating the necessity for a wider range of motion without changing the target orientation. These findings highlight the importance of considering spinopelvic alignment when planning cup positioning in THA to minimize the risk of dislocation. Level of Evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.