Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124259›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2025

A Diabetes Prevention Cascade Model for Healthcare Organizations: Results From a Pilot for Disproportionately Affected Populations.

Tamkeen Khan, Alejandro Hughes, Madeline Brady, Janet Williams, Mary Claire Gugerty, Anita Balan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tamkeen KhanAmerican Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Alejandro HughesOptum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
Madeline BradyAmerican Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Janet WilliamsAmerican Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Mary Claire GugertyAmerican College of Preventive Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia.
Anita BalanAmerican College of Preventive Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A conceptual cascade model was developed to track diabetes prevention efforts in the process for managing patients with prediabetes and compared with observed data from healthcare organizations. Methods: The cascade tracked patients eligible for diabetes prevention at each level of the cascade derived from multiple data sources. This was aligned with eligible (aggregated) data from 3 pilot healthcare organizations ( Results: Healthcare organizations had higher screening eligibility than expected (43% vs 35%). Laboratory tests ordered were lower than expected for the total population (42% vs 60%) and aligned well for the disproportionately affected population (57% vs 60%). Ranges for prediabetes laboratory tests were close to expected for the total (38% vs 35%) and disproportionately affected population (39% vs 35%). Referral rates were higher (assuming awareness of the condition) in the total (188% vs 25%) and disproportionately affected population (264% vs 25%). Conversion rates from referral to enrollment were lower than expected in the total (14% vs 25%) and disproportionately affected population (13% vs 25%). Conclusions: Despite increased referral rates, there is still a need to improve the enrollment conversion rate. Feedback from the conceptual model to observed data can provide critical findings to facilitate diabetes prevention efforts.

Indexed as

National DPPPrediabetespreventionscreeningType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID40124259
PMCPMC11928795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.