Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124240›Full record

ArticleThe Analysis of verbal behavior2024

A Comparison of Training Procedures on the Emergence of Intraverbal-Tacts.

Mary Halbur, Tiffany Kodak, Jessi Reidy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analysis of verbal behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary HalburUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center's Munroe-Meyer Institute, 5050 Ames Ave, Omaha, NE 68104 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2162-845X
Tiffany KodakMarquette University, Milwaukee, WI USA.
Jessi ReidyMarquette University, Milwaukee, WI USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocal exchanges are often comprised of responses under multiple sources of stimulus control. For example, a picture may contain multiple components, and an instructor may ask a learner to respond differentially to questions about the picture (e.g., "who," "what," "where," "color," "number," "shape"). The format of teaching may affect the development of verbal behavior under multiple sources of stimulus control. Therefore, the present investigation compared teaching stimuli in isolation to teaching with compound stimuli on the emergence of verbal behavior to evaluate methods that assist with correctly answering questions about compound stimuli. This study used a translational model with undergraduate students in Experiment 1 and replicated the procedures with a child with autism spectrum disorder in Experiment 2. Probes of untrained speaker and listener relations were conducted prior to training and following the emergence of the multiply controlled intraverbal tacts. Results show limited differences in the impact of training stimuli on acquisition and emergence. Results also show trial arrangements that may promote the emergence of untrained verbal relations. Potential clinical applications and suggestions for future research are discussed. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40616-024-00214-6.

Indexed as

Conditional discriminationsIntraverbal tactMultiple control

Identifiers

PMID40124240
PMCPMC11925836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.