Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124239›Full record

ArticleThe Analysis of verbal behavior2024

Teaching the Function of Auditory Stimuli Using Secondary Target Instruction.

Elisa Alban, Lauren K Schnell-Peskin, April N Kisamore, Casey L Nottingham, Zoe Sideras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analysis of verbal behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisa AlbanDepartment of Special Education, Hunter College, The City of New York, 695 Park Avenue 10025, New York, NY USA.
Lauren K Schnell-PeskinDepartment of Special Education, Hunter College, The City of New York, 695 Park Avenue 10025, New York, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9328-0659
April N KisamoreDepartment of Special Education, Hunter College, The City of New York, 695 Park Avenue 10025, New York, NY USA.
Casey L NottinghamABA Collective, Mahwah, NJ USA.
Zoe SiderasDepartment of Special Education, Hunter College, The City of New York, 695 Park Avenue 10025, New York, NY USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is important for children to learn to identify safety stimuli in their environment; however, there has been limited research in the field of behavior analysis related to effective and efficient strategies for teaching these skills to children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Although previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of using secondary targets to teach tacts of visual stimuli, little research has evaluated procedures to teach children with ASD to tact auditory stimuli. The purpose of this study was to teach individuals with ASD the function of auditory safety stimuli using secondary target instruction across two different instructional arrangements (Condition 1-Single Presentation and Condition 2-Re-presentation). Sessions to mastery and total training time were used to evaluate the efficiency of procedures. The results showed that participants learned all primary targets that were directly taught and that the secondary targets emerged in the absence of direct teaching in both conditions. Results also suggested that Condition 1-Single Presentation, resulted in more efficient learning across target sets for both participants, with one exception.

Indexed as

Auditory stimuliInstructive feedbackSafety soundsSecondary target instructionVerbal behavior

Identifiers

PMID40124239
PMCPMC11925817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.