Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124206›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025

Intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with geriatric trauma may not improve outcome but is associated with increases in resource utilization.

Bardiya Zangbar, Aryan Rafieezadeh, Kartik Prabhakaran, Joshua Klein, Matthew Bronstein, Ilya Shnaydman, Chirag Gandhi, Peter Rhee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bardiya ZangbarSurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1215-1693
Aryan RafieezadehSurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Kartik PrabhakaranSurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9837-999X
Joshua KleinSurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Matthew BronsteinSurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Ilya ShnaydmanSurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Chirag GandhiNeurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Peter RheeSurgery, St Barnabas Hospital, Bronx, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring (ICPM) is currently recommended for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The hypothesis was that ICPM does not change mortality in the geriatric patient population. Methods: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2017-2021) was queried to identify intubated geriatric patients (≥65 years of age) with isolated blunt TBI (non-Head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score <3), with admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 3-8. Patients with death on arrival or with hospital length of stay <24 hours and patients who underwent craniotomy before ICPM placement were excluded. Favorable discharge disposition was defined as home with or without assistance, and rehabilitation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between ICPM and non-ICPM patients and outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was defined as in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were defined as discharge disposition, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and ventilator days. Results: A total of 19 416 patients met criteria for analysis. ICPM was placed in only 12.1% (n=2363) patients. The Injury Severity Score, GCS and head AIS were similar between the patients with and without monitors. After PSM, we were able to match 2148 patients and there was no difference in mortality between the two groups (52.4% vs 52.1%, p=0.874); however, patients treated with ICPM had significantly longer hospital length of stay (10 (5-17) vs 7 (3-15) days, p<0.001), ICU length of stay (8 (4-14) vs 6 (3-10), p<0.001) and ventilator days (6 (3-11) vs 4 (2-7), p<0.001). Discharge disposition was trending towards unfavorable with increasing age but was similar between the ICPM and No-ICPM groups (p=0.115). Conclusion: The usefulness of ICPM in geriatric patients has not yet been shown and would benefit from prospective clinical studies. Minimizing ICPM in geriatric patients may reduce resource burdening without affecting outcome. Level of evidence: Level III retrospective study.

Indexed as

mortalitytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40124206
PMCPMC11927435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.