ArticleClinical interventions in aging2025
Validity of the Updated Rx-Risk Index as a Disease Identification and Risk-Adjustment Tool for Use in Observational Health Studies.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Service-Level Utilization in Risk-Based Contracts and a Benchmarking Approach for Fee-Schedule Reforms.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Derivation and Validation of Charlson, Elixhauser and RxRisk Cost-Based Comorbidity Indices: A Register-Based Study of 350,000 Individuals Over 11 Years.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- The epidemiological impact and effectiveness of herpes zoster vaccination among older and pharmacologically immunocompromised adults: a population-based observational study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Data Resource Profile: Australia's Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA).International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Multimorbidity Clusters Among People Aged 65 Years and Over in Australia: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Data Linkage Study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Pancreatectomy Among Australians With Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Study.ANZ journal of surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Identifying patient health conditions in observational studies is essential for accurately measuring healthcare practices and planning effective health policy interventions. This analysis evaluates the validity of the Rx-Risk Index, a tool that uses medication dispensing data to identify patient comorbidities and measure overall health. We examined an updated version of the Rx-Risk Index, reflecting changes in treatment practices, to assess its validity as a tool for identifying specific health conditions and as a measure of overall health to aid in risk adjustment in observational studies. Patients and Methods: We conducted a validation study using two Australian linked health datasets, the Person-Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA) and the National Health Data Hub (NHDH), from 2010 to 2018, focusing on individuals aged 65 years or older. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV/NPV, Cohen's kappa, and F1 scores were used to assess agreement between Rx-Risk Index conditions and two reference standards: patient self-reported conditions and hospital diagnosis. The Rx-Risk Index's predictive validity for one-year mortality was also evaluated using logistic regression, with model fit assessed by AIC and c-statistic. Results: Data were analysed from 3,959 individuals in PLIDA and 157,709 individuals in NHDH. The Rx-Risk Index showed high sensitivity (≥75%) for diabetes, chronic airways disease, hyperlipidemia, and epilepsy against both self-reported conditions and hospital diagnoses. However, hyperlipidemia and hypertension showed lower specificity (<70%). High PPVs (≥78%) were observed for diabetes and renal failure. The agreement between the Rx-Risk Index and self-reported conditions was stronger (Cohen's kappa: 0.41-0.81 for 7 conditions) than between Rx-Risk Index and ICD10-AM diagnoses (kappa: 0.73 for one condition). The Rx-Risk Index was a strong predictor of one-year mortality, with c-statistic of 0.820 (95% CI: 0.817-0.825). Conclusion: Selected Rx-Risk Index conditions are reasonable proxies for identifying specific conditions, particularly those requiring pharmacological management. The Rx-Risk Index was a strong predictor of one-year mortality, suggesting it is a valid measure of overall health. This study demonstrates the Rx-Risk Index's potential to enhance disease classification and risk adjustment in observational studies, supporting informed decision-making in health policy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.