Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124128›Full record

ArticleQuantitative science studies2025

Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities.

Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach, Kristi Holmes, Tony Ross-Hellauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative science studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad HosseiniDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2385-985X
Serge P J M HorbachInstitute for Science in Society, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0406-6261
Kristi HolmesDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8420-5254
Tony Ross-HellauerOpen and Reproducible Research Group, Know-Center GmbH and Institute for Interactive Systems and Data Science, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4470-7027

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
NUCATS CTSA UM1 at Northwestern UniversityUM1TR005121 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Sara Becker, Richard D'Aquila · 2024 to 2026
$23.4M
Network of the National Library of Medicine Evaluation CenterU24LM013751 · NLM · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KRISTI HOLMES · 2021 to 2026
$4.9M
Zenodo and the Generalist Repository Ecosystem Initiative (GREI)OT2DB000013 · OD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KRISTI HOLMES · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
DB NIH HHS OT2 DB000013NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR005121NLM NIH HHS U24 LM013751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology influences Open Science (OS) practices, because conducting science in transparent, accessible, and participatory ways requires tools and platforms for collaboration and sharing results. Due to this relationship, the characteristics of the employed technologies directly impact OS objectives. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly used by researchers for tasks such as text refining, code generation/editing, reviewing literature, and data curation/analysis. Nevertheless, concerns about openness, transparency, and bias suggest that GenAI may benefit from greater engagement with OS. GenAI promises substantial efficiency gains but is currently fraught with limitations that could negatively impact core OS values, such as fairness, transparency, and integrity, and may harm various social actors. In this paper, we explore the possible positive and negative impacts of GenAI on OS. We use the taxonomy within the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science to systematically explore the intersection of GenAI and OS. We conclude that using GenAI could advance key OS objectives by broadening meaningful access to knowledge, enabling efficient use of infrastructure, improving engagement of societal actors, and enhancing dialogue among knowledge systems. However, due to GenAI's limitations, it could also compromise the integrity, equity, reproducibility, and reliability of research. Hence, sufficient checks, validation, and critical assessments are essential when incorporating GenAI into research workflows.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedataimpactsopen sciencesoftwareworkflows

Identifiers

PMID40124128
PMCPMC11928019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.