ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2025
Exploring synergistic effects: Atorvastatin and electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury therapy.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord trauma represents a significant clinical challenge, and improving patient outcomes is a main priority for many scientific teams globally. Despite advances in the understanding its pathogenesis, the overall mechanisms occurring in the spinal cord after traumatic injury remain unclear. This study explores the possible synergistic effects of a regenerative therapy that combines electrical stimulation with the anti-inflammatory drug Atorvastatin (ATR) after spinal cord injury (SCI). SCI was induced at the T9 segment under isoflurane anesthesia and applying a compression force of 40 g for 15 minutes. An oscillating field stimulator (OFS) was implanted subcutaneously, delivering a weak electric current (50 µA) that changed polarity every 15 minutes for six weeks to promote axonal growth at the injury site. Female Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups: SCI with non-functional stimulator (SCI + nOFS), SCI with functional stimulator (SCI+OFS), and two groups that received ATR together with stimulator for 7 days after injury (SCI+OFS+ATR, SCI+nOFS+ATR). Behavioral tests (hot-plate test and BBB scale) showed improvement in sensory and motor performance in animals treated with the combination therapy. The protein levels of astrocytes (GFAP), neurofilaments (NF-L), newly sprouting axons (GAP-43), and oligodendrocytes (PLP -1, CNPase) were analysed by Western blot. The results showed increased neurofilaments, newly sprouting axons and oligodendrocytes in groups receiving both individual and combination therapies, with a decrease in their concentrations in the following order: SCI+OFS+ATR, SCI+nOFS+ATR, SCI+OFS, SCI+nOFS. In addition, astrocyte protein levels were lower in the SCI+OFS+ATR group compared with others. Histological analysis showed a significant reduction in white and gray matter after SCI, but less white and gray matter volume loss was found in the groups receiving therapies (SCI+OFS+ATR, SCI+nOFS+ATR, SCI+OFS). These results suggest that the combination of Atorvastatin with OFS stimulation promotes neural recovery after SCI, highlighting the potential of combination therapies in enhancing regenerative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.