Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124108›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025

Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts.

Salwa Hassanein, Rabie Adel El Arab, Amany Abdrbo, Mohammad S Abu-Mahfouz, Mastoura Khames Farag Gaballah, Mohamed Mahmoud Seweid, Mohammed Almari, Husam Alzghoul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Salwa HassaneinNursing Department, Almoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Rabie Adel El ArabNursing Department, Almoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Amany AbdrboNursing Department, Almoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad S Abu-MahfouzNursing Department, Almoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Mastoura Khames Farag GaballahNursing Department, Almoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed Mahmoud SeweidNursing Department, Almoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlmariNursing Department, Almoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Husam AlzghoulNursing Department, Almoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advances in digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) are reshaping healthcare delivery, with AI increasingly integrated into nursing practice. These innovations promise enhanced diagnostic precision, improved operational workflows, and more personalized patient care. However, the direct impact of AI on clinical outcomes, workflow efficiency, and nursing staff well-being requires further elucidation. Methods: This integrative review synthesized findings from 18 studies published through November 2024 across diverse healthcare settings. Using the PRISMA 2020 and SPIDER frameworks alongside rigorous quality appraisal tools (MMAT and ROBINS-I), the review examined the multifaceted effects of AI integration in nursing. Our analysis focused on three principal domains: clinical advancements and patient monitoring, operational efficiency and workload management, and ethical implications. Results: The review demonstrates that AI integration in nursing has yielded substantial clinical and operational benefits. AI-powered monitoring systems, including wearable sensors and real-time alert platforms, have enabled nurses to detect subtle physiological changes-such as early fever onset or pain indicators-well before traditional methods, resulting in timely interventions that reduce complications, shorten hospital stays, and lower readmission rates. For example, several studies reported that early-warning algorithms facilitated faster clinical responses, thereby improving patient safety and outcomes. Operationally, AI-based automation of routine tasks (e.g., scheduling, administrative documentation, and predictive workload classification) has streamlined resource allocation. These efficiencies have led to a measurable reduction in nurse burnout and improved job satisfaction, as nurses can devote more time to direct patient care. However, despite these benefits, ethical challenges remain prominent. Key concerns include data privacy risks, algorithmic bias, and the potential erosion of clinical judgment due to overreliance on technology. These issues underscore the need for robust ethical frameworks and targeted AI literacy training within nursing curricula. Conclusion: This review demonstrates that AI integration holds transformative potential for nursing practice by enhancing both clinical outcomes and operational efficiency. However, to realize these benefits fully, it is imperative to develop robust ethical frameworks, incorporate comprehensive AI literacy training into nursing education, and foster interdisciplinary collaboration. Future longitudinal studies across varied clinical contexts are essential to validate these findings and support the sustainable, equitable implementation of AI technologies in nursing. Policymakers and healthcare leaders must prioritize investments in AI solutions that complement the expertise of nursing professionals while addressing ethical risks.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical outcomesethical implicationsnursing practiceoperational efficiencystaff wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40124108
PMCPMC11926144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.