Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124106›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Effect of a digital blood pressure coach on hypertension management in primary care practices-a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.

Christian Beger, Dominik Rüegger, Anna Lenz, Steffen Wagner, Kai Martin Schmidt-Ott, Dirk Volland, Florian P Limbourg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The role of artificial intelligence in hypertension management.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christian BegerVascular Medicine Research, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Dominik RüeggerPathmate Technologies GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
Anna LenzPathmate Technologies GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
Steffen WagnerDepartment II (Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry), Berliner Hochschule für Technik, Berlin, Germany.
Kai Martin Schmidt-OttDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Dirk VollandPathmate Technologies GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
Florian P LimbourgVascular Medicine Research, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Smartphone medical applications (apps) may improve blood pressure (BP) control in the primary care setting in patients with hypertension. However, real-world evidence from primary care is largely lacking. Objective: To analyse, in primary care practices in Germany, the effect of a smartphone app on systolic BP compared to standard of care. Design: A pragmatic, non-blinded randomized controlled trial with patients with a diagnosis of hypertension was conducted across 23 general practices in Germany, with a follow-up period of 3 months. Recruitment occurred from January 2022 to May 2023. Intervention: The intervention group received access to the Manoa app, a smartphone coach integrating guideline-compliant home BP monitoring and lifestyle-coaching. All study participants received standard treatment for arterial hypertension at the discretion of the treating physician. Main Outcomes: The primary outcome was office systolic BP (oSBP) after 90-150 days in participants with uncontrolled hypertension (oSBP ≥140 mmHg). Secondary outcomes included changes in systolic and diastolic BP, BP control and adherence to home blood pressure monitoring. Results: A total of 606 participants from 23 general practices were randomized, after data clearance and review, 249 participants were assigned to the control group and 259 to the intervention group for analysis. The mean age (SD) of participants in the intervention group was 55.9 (12.9) years. At baseline, participants with uncontrolled hypertension had a mean oSBP (SD) of 152.6 (14.2) mmHg in the intervention group ( Conclusions and Relevance: Participants with uncontrolled hypertension randomized to an app in primary care achieved similar decreases in systolic BP but higher adherence to home BP monitoring compared to standard care. In this open-label, pragmatic trial, variability in hypertension management strategies and limited standardization across practices may have confounded the precise evaluation of digital intervention benefits. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier, (DRKS00027964).

Indexed as

home blood pressure monitoringhypertensionmedical appsmHealthprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID40124106
PMCPMC11925922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.