ArticleJournal of visual impairment & blindness
Driving Difficulties and Coping Strategies in Persons with Homonymous Quadrantanopia or Homonymous Scotoma.
Article in Journal of visual impairment & blindness. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reinforcement-Based Head Scan Training for Drivers With Homonymous Visual Field Loss: Improves Blind-Side Detection.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.Vision research · 2026Article
- Use and preferences of advanced driver assistance systems by drivers with homonymous visual field loss.Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2026Article
- Are directional or non-directional hazard warnings more helpful for drivers with homonymous visual field loss?Applied ergonomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: This study, conducted in the United States, investigated the challenges faced by drivers with homonymous visual field loss and their coping strategies, including the use of in-vehicle Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). Methods: Four current drivers with either homonymous quadrantanopia or homonymous scotoma caused by a stroke completed an in-depth semi-structured telephone interview. Using mostly open-ended questions, the interview addressed the difficulties encountered while driving, strategies used to cope with the difficulties, and the use of ADAS. Results: The main difficulties related to seeing objects on side of the field loss especially at intersections and when merging or changing lanes. Cases with left-sided field loss reported problems with left turns and seeing oncoming cars at intersections. Cases with homonymous scotomas described how cars disappeared in and out of the scotoma. Two cases reported many driving difficulties at first, but fewer difficulties as they became used to driving with the field loss. The most common coping strategies included scanning to the side of the field loss (including large scans with head movements), use of rearview/side mirrors, adding mirrors to the car, leaving more space on the side of the field loss, avoiding difficult driving situations and the use of ADAS (blind spot warning, GPS navigation and rearview camera). Discussion: All cases reported some difficulties consistent with those found in on-road and driving simulator studies of individuals with homonymous visual field loss. Over time they each reported developing a set of strategies, including use of ADAS, for coping with the field loss that enabled them to be active drivers with relatively few self-imposed restrictions. Implications for Practitioners: Advising drivers with stroke-related field loss about potential difficulties and compensatory strategies is an important part of preparation for return to driving. The paper provides examples of problem situations, coping strategies and ADAS use which can be used to guide discussion.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.