Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124096›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

The relevance of lead prioritization: a B2B lead scoring model based on machine learning.

Laura González-Flores, Jessica Rubiano-Moreno, Guillermo Sosa-Gómez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura González-FloresUniversidad Panamericana, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
Jessica Rubiano-MorenoFacultad de Ciencias Administrativas y Comerciales, Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales, Bogotá, Colombia.
Guillermo Sosa-GómezUniversidad Panamericana, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In business-to-business (B2B) companies, marketing and sales teams face significant challenges in identifying, qualifying, and prioritizing a large number of leads. Lead prioritization is a critical task for B2B organizations because it allows them to allocate resources more effectively, focus their sales force on the most viable and valuable opportunities, optimize their time spent qualifying leads, and maximize their B2B digital marketing strategies. This article addresses the topic by presenting a case study of a B2B software company's development of a lead scoring model based on data analytics and machine learning under the consumer theory approach. The model was developed using real lead data generated between January 2020 and April 2024, extracted from the company's CRM, which were analyzed and evaluated by fifteen classification algorithms, where the results in terms of accuracy and ROC AUC showed a superior performance of the Gradient Boosting Classifier over the other classifiers. At the same time, the feature importance analysis allowed the identification of features such as "source" and "lead status," which increased the accuracy of the conversion prediction. The developed model significantly improved the company's ability to identify high quality leads compared to the traditional methods used. This research confirms and complements existing theories related to understanding the application of consumer behavior theory and the application of machine learning in the development of B2B lead scoring models. This study also contributes to bridging the gap between marketers and data scientists in jointly understanding lead scoring as a critical activity because of its impact on overall marketing strategy performance and sales revenue performance in B2B organizations.

Indexed as

B2B salesbusiness-to-businessCRMdigital marketinglead conversionlead qualificationlead scoringmarketing automation

Identifiers

PMID40124096
PMCPMC11925937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.