ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
The relevance of lead prioritization: a B2B lead scoring model based on machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A review of AI-based business lead generation: Scrapus as a case study.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In business-to-business (B2B) companies, marketing and sales teams face significant challenges in identifying, qualifying, and prioritizing a large number of leads. Lead prioritization is a critical task for B2B organizations because it allows them to allocate resources more effectively, focus their sales force on the most viable and valuable opportunities, optimize their time spent qualifying leads, and maximize their B2B digital marketing strategies. This article addresses the topic by presenting a case study of a B2B software company's development of a lead scoring model based on data analytics and machine learning under the consumer theory approach. The model was developed using real lead data generated between January 2020 and April 2024, extracted from the company's CRM, which were analyzed and evaluated by fifteen classification algorithms, where the results in terms of accuracy and ROC AUC showed a superior performance of the Gradient Boosting Classifier over the other classifiers. At the same time, the feature importance analysis allowed the identification of features such as "source" and "lead status," which increased the accuracy of the conversion prediction. The developed model significantly improved the company's ability to identify high quality leads compared to the traditional methods used. This research confirms and complements existing theories related to understanding the application of consumer behavior theory and the application of machine learning in the development of B2B lead scoring models. This study also contributes to bridging the gap between marketers and data scientists in jointly understanding lead scoring as a critical activity because of its impact on overall marketing strategy performance and sales revenue performance in B2B organizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.