ArticleACS omega2025
Gd(OH)
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The microwave-assisted synthesis method was used to synthesize gadolinium hydroxide nanorods (GH NRs) and 4-12% cobalt-doped gadolinium hydroxide nanorods (4CGH, 8CGH, and 12CGH NRs). X-ray diffraction confirmed that the GH NRs and CGH NRs are in the hexagonal phase with average crystallite sizes between 17 and 36 nm. Raman and FT-IR spectra confirmed the presence of vibrational modes of GH and CGH. The influence of Co doping was observed in the reduction of the band gap energy from 5.00 to 4.29 eV. TEM images showed nanorods of GH and CGH and that the particle size was increased upon doping with Co
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.