Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124025›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Study on Horizontal Leakage Diffusion Characteristics of Small and Medium Aperture in High-Pressure Natural Gas Pipelines with Large Open Spaces.

Shengzhu Zhang, Jiahang Li, Xu Wang, Jie Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shengzhu ZhangChina Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing 100012, China.
Jiahang LiChina Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing 100012, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9023-4781
Xu WangCollege of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China.
Jie ZhangWest Pipeline Company of PipeChina, Ürümqi, Xinjiang 830010, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In all leakage incidents, the failure frequency of pinholes and cracks is significantly higher than that of other aperture types, making them the most critical points of failure in natural gas pipeline accidents. This paper presents a full-scale field test of aperture leakage in a high-pressure natural gas pipeline conducted in an open space for a horizontal jet leakage scenario. A proportional leakage diffusion numerical model was developed and validated by using the test results. The study investigates the effects of ambient wind speed, pipeline pressure, and leakage aperture size on the gas diffusion characteristics. The findings reveal that in the downwind direction, wind speed initially disturbs and then dilutes gas diffusion, with a critical wind speed of around 6 m/s. In headwind conditions, the forward diffusion of the gas cloud is significantly reduced, leading to greater lateral diffusion. Pipeline pressure is a key factor influencing gas leakage rates. The higher the pipeline pressure, the faster the expansion of the gas cloud at the lower explosion limit and the shorter the time needed to reach a stable state. There is a positive correlation between aperture size and the gas cloud's area, concentration, and diffusion distance. Specifically, the gas cloud area for a 25 mm aperture is approximately four times larger than that of a 5 mm aperture. The results of this research provide crucial support for mitigating the consequences of long-distance natural gas pipeline accidents and planning emergency response efforts.

Identifiers

PMID40124025
PMCPMC11923849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.