ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025
Use of real-world evidence in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A checklist for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and manufacturers.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating Real-World Evidence and Reported Survival Outcomes of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer.Oncology and therapy · 2026Article
- R WE ready for reimbursement? A round up of developments in real-world evidence relating to health technology assessment: part 19.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Under the Inflation Reduction Act's (IRA's) - Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS's) "maximum fair price" must be informed by evidence on factors such as therapeutic advance of the selected drug compared with its alternative, comparative effectiveness across clinical and patient-reported outcomes, the impact on specific populations, and the ability to address unmet medical needs. This paper describes how real-world evidence could improve CMS decision-making and creates a best practices checklist to help CMS evaluate the quality of any manufacturer-submitted evidence. The checklist was developed in four steps: (i) identification of the IRA requirements for determining the maximum fair price through a review of official guidance from CMS, (ii) assessment of provisions that could be supported by real-world evidence (RWE) in addition to clinical trial evidence, (iii) literature review on existing best-practice guidelines relevant to RWE, and (iv) consolidation of these RWE guidelines into a checklist through a series of web conference discussions among experts. The checklist aims to improve the quality of the information available to CMS during the drug price negotiation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.