ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2025
Comparative Analysis of Multi-Omics Integration Using Graph Neural Networks for Cancer Classification.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking through the radiation dilemma: development and clinical translation of anti-radiation drugs.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2026Review
- Deep Generative and Graph-Based Representation Learning for Multiomics Survival Stratification in Ovarian Cancer: Secondary Analysis.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2026Article
- A Bioinformatics Analysis Based on Omics and Clinical Data for Graph-Based Patient Stratification in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Biology · 2026Article
- Review
- PEARL: integrative multi-omics classification and omics feature discovery via deep graph learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and multi-omics integration in liquid biopsy for genitourinary cancers: a systematic scoping review.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Enabled Multi-Omics Integration: A New Frontier in Precise Drug Target Discovery.Biology · 2026Review
- The central role of EMT in tumor progression: mechanistic drivers, biomarker discovery, and therapeutic horizons.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Article
- Multi-omics profiling and AI-driven clinically deployable risk models in MGUS and smoldering myeloma.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Epigallocatechin Gallate as a Molecular Therapeutic in Heart Failure and Cardio-Oncology: Mechanistic Pathways and Translational Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Optimizing breast cancer chemotherapy by harnessing gut microbiota with insights from artificial intelligence.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Review
- Decoding cancer prognosis with deep learning: the ASD-cancer framework for tumor microenvironment analysis.mSystems · 2025Article
- M-GNN: A Graph Neural Network Framework for Lung Cancer Detection Using Metabolomics and Heterogeneous Graph Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Prognostic risk modeling of endometrial cancer using programmed cell death-related genes: a comprehensive machine learning approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies on integrating multiple omics data highlighted the potential to advance our understanding of the cancer disease process. Computational models based on graph neural networks and attention-based architectures have demonstrated promising results for cancer classification due to their ability to model complex relationships among biological entities. However, challenges related to addressing the high dimensionality and complexity in integrating multi-omics data, as well as in constructing graph structures that effectively capture the interactions between nodes, remain active areas of research. This study evaluates graph neural network architectures for multi-omics (MO) data integration based on graph-convolutional networks (GCN), graph-attention networks (GAT), and graph-transformer networks (GTN). Differential gene expression and LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression are employed for reducing the omics data dimensionality and feature selection; hence, the developed models are referred to as LASSO-MOGCN, LASSO-MOGAT, and LASSO-MOGTN. Graph structures constructed using sample correlation matrices and protein-protein interaction networks are investigated. Experimental validation is performed with a dataset of 8,464 samples from 31 cancer types and normal tissue, comprising messenger-RNA, micro-RNA, and DNA methylation data. The results show that the models integrating multi-omics data outperformed the models trained on single omics data, where LASSO-MOGAT achieved the best overall performance, with an accuracy of 95.9%. The findings also suggest that correlation-based graph structures enhance the models' ability to identify shared cancer-specific signatures across patients in comparison to protein-protein interaction networks-based graph structures. The code and data used in this study are available in the link (https://github.com/FadiAlharbi2024/Graph_Based_Architecture.git).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.