ArticleOchsner journal2025
Enhancing Physician Satisfaction and Patient Safety Through an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Scheduling System in Anesthesiology.
Article in Ochsner journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of an AI-Based Constraint-Optimization Scheduler to Optimize On-Call Schedule Equity and Reduce Administrative Burden in a Pediatric Residency: Retrospective Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Tackling Administrative Burden in Graduate Medical Education: Consider AI-Powered Tools.Journal of graduate medical education · 2026Article
- Digitalizing informed consent in healthcare: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Overcoming challenges to effective clinical practice depends on finding dynamic solutions to issues such as physician burnout and patient safety. This study evaluated the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven scheduling system on physician burnout and patient safety, using intraoperative transitions of care as an operative metric for patient safety. Methods: In May 2019, the Department of Anesthesiology at Ochsner Health in New Orleans, Louisiana, implemented an AI-driven scheduling system called Lightning Bolt Scheduling (PerfectServe, Inc). Utilizing an idealized design framework, the department steering committee analyzed 12 months of historic operating room data and developed more than 400 scheduling rules to optimize staffing. The scheduling rules, representing the steering committee's new work model, were provided as inputs into Lightning Bolt Scheduling, which then used combinatorial optimization to recommend an ideal staff schedule. Preimplementation and postimplementation data were collected on physician satisfaction, vacation approval rates, and intraoperative transitions of care. Results: Six months postimplementation, physician satisfaction scores and vacation approvals increased, reflecting improved work-life balance, schedule flexibility, and decreased symptoms of burnout. Additionally, 1,072 fewer handoffs occurred, equating to 71.5 fewer adverse events and a savings of approximately $335,550 in health care costs during the 21 months after implementation. Conclusion: Our study findings underscore the potential of data-driven scheduling systems to enhance physician well-being and patient safety, thereby promoting continuous improvement and adaptability in health care operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.