ArticleOchsner journal2025
Comparative Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Pain Management Approaches for Sternotomy in Cardiac Surgeries-Transversus Thoracic Muscle Plane Block vs Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block.
Article in Ochsner journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pain management after sternotomy in cardiac surgery is vital for recovery. Opioids are commonly used, but they carry risk. Central neuraxial techniques and nerve blocks are options for a multimodality approach. Fascial plane blocks such as the transversus thoracic muscle plane block (TTMPB) and the pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) are a relatively new way to relieve pain, and their popularity has increased with the use of ultrasound for precise anatomic visualization. Because the effectiveness of both blocks is similar, we conducted this study to compare the pain management of the TTMPB and the PIFB after sternotomy in cardiac surgery. Methods: This randomized double-blind study included 118 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. In the TTMPB group (n=59), 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected bilaterally using ultrasound assistance in the transversus thoracic plane. In the PIFB group (n=59), 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected in the pecto-intercostal plane. Study outcomes were opioid consumption in the first 24 hours and pain scores at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Results: Patient characteristics in the 2 groups were similar. Opioid consumption was similar in both groups ( Conclusion: The TTMPB and the PIFB were similarly effective in treating acute poststernotomy pain in our patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.