Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40123894›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2025

Biopsy vs comprehensive embryo/blastocyst analysis: a closer look at embryonic chromosome evaluation.

Jian Xu, Zhiheng Chen, Meiyi Li, Ling Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jian XuCenter of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Zhiheng ChenCenter of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Meiyi LiCenter of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Ling SunCenter of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4267-8210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionCompared with embryonic cytogenetic constitution of biopsied samples in human pre-implantation embryos, are there any differences in whole embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER: Whole embryos exhibit a significantly higher euploidy rate and reduction in mosaic aneuploidy rate compared to biopsied samples. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Much of the existing evidence of cytogenetic constitution of human pre-implantation embryos is based on biopsied cells obtained from blastomeres or trophectoderm biopsies. The mosaic rate of biopsies taken from blastocyst trophectoderm ranges widely, from 2% to 25%. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: We investigated the embryonic cytogenetic constitution of 221 whole human embryos/blastocysts from 2019 to 2022, including 41 high-quality blastocysts, 57 low-quality blastocysts, and 123 arrested embryos/blastocysts. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsThe cytogenetic constitution of whole embryos/blastocysts was assessed using next-generation sequencing. Mosaicism was diagnosed using a cut-off threshold of 30-70%, with embryos displaying 30-70% aneuploid cells classified as mosaic. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among high-quality blastocysts, the euploidy rate was 82.9%, with a remarkably low mosaic aneuploidy of only 2.5%. The euploidy rates of viable low-quality blastocysts and arrested embryos/blastocysts were 38.6% and 13.0%, respectively. The mosaic aneuploidy rate decreased progressively with embryonic development, from 93.2% at the cleavage stage to 40% at the blastocyst stage. Chaotic aneuploidy was the primary factor (66.1%, 39/59) contributing to embryonic arrest at the cleavage stage. Additionally, 26.1% of embryos/blastocysts exhibited segmental aneuploidy, with segmental duplications (30.6%, 22/72) and deletions (54.2%, 39/72) being the most common types of segmental aneuploidy. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size in this study is relatively small, especially in the subgroup analysis. Furthermore, whole-embryo analysis is not a foolproof diagnostic method, since it may underestimate the presence of mosaicism. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe cytogenetic constitution of whole embryos provides a more accurate reflection of their physiological state compared to biopsied samples. The low mosaic aneuploidy rate in high-quality blastocysts supports the practice of transferring mosaic embryos in patients without euploid embryos. If blastocysts reach stage III by Day 6 post-fertilization, nearly half are euploid, suggesting that extending embryo culture to Day 7 may be beneficial in cases where high-quality embryos are lacking. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2023A1515010250) and Pilot Program-China Reproductive Health Public Welfare Fund Project (No. SZ202413). The authors report no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

cytogenetic constitutionhumanmosaic aneuploidypre-implantation embryostrophectoderm biopsywhole embryo

Identifiers

PMID40123894
PMCPMC11928226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.