ArticleDigital health
The urge for specific standards of telepharmacy services: Lessons learned from qualitative study in Indonesian community pharmacies.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Like many low- and middle-income countries, Indonesia lacks specific standards for telepharmacy practices, which requires adherence to traditional pharmacy guidelines to evaluate the services. This study aims to explore the disparities between the implementation of telepharmacy services in community pharmacies and the established Indonesian pharmaceutical service standards. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in seven community pharmacies in Depok, an urban area near Jakarta. Data were collected in 2023 using triangulation methods: semi-structured interviews, direct observations, and simulated patient interactions. Verbatim transcriptions and thematic analysis were performed using NVivo Results: Four identified themes were the structures, daily practices, challenges, and enablers of telepharmacy services. The scope of telepharmacy services consisted of dispensing medicines, patient education, and providing drug information through mobile applications by pharmacy electronic system organisers (PSEF) or social media platforms. Challenges in daily practice revealed gaps in traditional pharmaceutical service guidelines, including systems interoperability, effective communication among pharmacists-physician-patients, and the need for standards specific to digital pharmaceutical services. Common problems in telepharmacy were uncertain medicine availability, unclear e-prescription validity, limited pharmacist-physician collaboration, and impeded patient education, particularly in services provided through PSEF applications. On the other hand, the availability of digital technologies was seen as beneficial, highlighting the necessity for predefined standardised facilities to ensure the quality of telepharmacy services. Conclusion: While traditional pharmaceutical service standards can be applied to evaluate telepharmacy practices, specific challenges must be explicitly addressed within a dedicated telepharmacy standard to ensure patient safety and service quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.