ReviewMedComm2025
Bioactive hemostatic materials: a new strategy for promoting wound healing and tissue regeneration.
Review in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chlorogenic Acid-Embedded Hydrogel for Visual pH Monitoring and Enhanced Antibacterial Performance.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The dual role of the microbiome in chronic wound management.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- NIR Light-Driven Photocatalytic Antibacterial Hydrogels for Synergistic MRSA Biofilm Eradication and Wound Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Applications of Multifunctional Hydrogel in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.MedComm · 2026Review
- Synergistic protective and regenerative effects of hyaluronic acid and polynucleotides against UVA-induced oxidative stress in dermal fibroblasts.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Organoids for disease modeling and treatment: state-of-the-art.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Targeting delayed healing tissues: immune reprogramming of adaptive immune cells by biomaterials.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Review
- Bioactive hemostatic materials: a new strategy for promoting wound healing and tissue regeneration.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing remains a critical global healthcare challenge, with an annual treatment cost exceeding $50 billion worldwide. Over the past decade, significant advances in wound care have focused on developing sophisticated biomaterials that promote tissue regeneration and prevent complications. Despite these developments, there remains a crucial need for multifunctional wound healing materials that can effectively address the complex, multiphase nature of wound repair while being cost effective and easily applicable in various clinical settings. This review systematically analyzes the latest developments in wound healing materials, examining their chemical composition, structural design, and therapeutic mechanisms. We comprehensively evaluate various bioactive components, including natural polymers, synthetic matrices, and hybrid composites, along with their different forms, such as hydrogels, powders, and smart dressings. Special attention is given to emerging strategies in material design that integrate multiple therapeutic functions, including sustained drug delivery, infection prevention, and tissue regeneration promotion. The insights provided in this review illuminate the path toward next-generation wound healing materials, highlighting opportunities for developing more effective therapeutic solutions that can significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.