Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40123816›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025

Expression of CXCR4 in the Primary Lesion of Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer and Its Association With Prognosis.

DanChan Huang, DanXia Lin, SiXian Liang, Jing Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

DanChan HuangDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, 515000, People's Republic of China.
DanXia LinDepartment of Breast Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, 515000, People's Republic of China.
SiXian LiangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, 515000, People's Republic of China.
Jing LinDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, 515000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0008-5655-384X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study examined CXCR4 expression in primary lesions of recurrent metastatic breast cancer patients, analyzing its association with clinicopathological features, chemotherapy efficacy, and prognosis. Methods: Eighty-five early surgical specimens of advanced BCa were examined for CXCR4 expression using immunohistochemical staining. The relationships between CXCR4 expression and clinical pathological factors, such as tumor size, lymph node metastasis, tumor stage, and metastatic site, were statistically analyzed, along with their effect on the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy and prognosis in patients with advanced BCa. Results: Significant associations were found between high CXCR4 levels in primary lesions of recurrent metastatic BCa and more frequent visceral metastases ( Conclusion: Patients with recurrent metastatic BCa with high expression of CXCR4 in primary lesions have poor efficacy with platinum-based chemotherapy, shorter DFS and OS, and poor prognosis. CXCR4 may be an important biomarker in metastatic BCa. It can be used not only as a predictor of metastasis and prognosis, but also as a therapeutic target and a tool to monitor treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

breast cancerchemotherapy efficacyCXCR4prognosis

Identifiers

PMID40123816
PMCPMC11929416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.