ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2025
Evaluation of hemodynamic changes with ultrasound cardiac output monitoring during burn wound excision and skin grafting in severely burned patients: a prospective observational study.
Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate changes in hemodynamic parameters using the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitoring (USCOM) method during general anesthesia for burn wound excision and skin grafting surgery in patients with severe burns.
methodsThis prospective observational study included 40 severe burn patients, aged 18-60 years, treated at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Le Huu Trac National Burn Hospital (Hanoi, Vietnam). All patients underwent burn wound excision and skin grafting between June 2023 and March 2024.
resultsThe average heart rate (HR) at the study time points ranged from 116.8 to 124.3 beats/min. The differences in HR at T
conclusionThe study demonstrated that hemodynamic parameters, including CO, CI, SV, SVI, SVR, and SVRI, remained within normal ranges throughout the anesthesia process. However, heart rate and blood pressure tended to be elevated, reflecting the hemodynamic characteristics of burn patients. This underscores the importance of close monitoring and adaptive management during anesthesia and resuscitation to ensure hemodynamic stability tailored to the characteristics of severe burn patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.