ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Gross tumor volume confidence maps prediction for soft tissue sarcomas from multi-modality medical images using a diffusion model.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and purpose: Accurate delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) is essential for radiotherapy of soft tissue sarcomas. However, manual GTV delineation from multi-modality images is time-consuming. Furthermore, GTV delineation is subject to inter- and intra-reader variability, which reduces the reproducibility of treatment planning. To address these issues, this work aims to develop a highly accurate automatic delineation technique modeling reader variability for soft tissue sarcomas using deep learning. Materials and methods: We employed a publicly available soft tissue sarcoma dataset consisting of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET), X-ray Computed Tomography (CT), and pre-contrast T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans for 51 patients, of which 49 were selected for analysis. The GTVs were delineated by six experienced readers, each reader performing GTV contouring multiple times for every patient. The confidence maps were calculated by averaging the labels provided by all readers, resulting in values ranging from 0 to 1. We developed and trained a diffusion model-based neural network to predict confidence maps of GTV for soft tissue sarcomas from multi-modality medical images. Results: Quantitative analysis showed that the proposed diffusion model performed competitively with U-Net-based models, frequently ranking first or second across five evaluation metrics: Dice Index, Hausdorff Distance, Recall, Precision, and Brier Score. Additionally, experiments evaluating the impact of different imaging modalities demonstrated that incorporating multi-modality image inputs provided improved performance compared to single-modality and dual-modality inputs. Conclusion: The proposed diffusion model is capable of predicting accurate confidence maps of GTV for soft tissue sarcomas from multi-modality inputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.