ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Efficient strategy for magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy of rectal cancer using a library of reference plans.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Total Neoadjuvant Therapy, Organ Preservation and Beyond: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Management.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Adaptive radiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer using a magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator has limitations in managing bladder shape variations. Conventional couch shifts may result in missing the target while requiring a large margin. Conversely, fully adaptive strategy is time-consuming. Therefore, a more efficient strategy for online adaptive radiotherapy is required. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 50 fractions from 10 patients with rectal cancer undergoing preoperative radiotherapy. The proposed method involved preparing a library of reference plans (LoRP) based on diverse bladder shapes. For each fraction, a plan from the LoRP was selected based on daily bladder filling. This plan was compared with those generated by conventional couch shift and fully adaptive strategies. The clinical acceptability of the plans (i.e., per protocol, variation-acceptable, or unacceptable) was assessed. Results: In per protocol criterion, 44 %, 6 %, and 100 % of the plans for LoRP, conventional couch shift, and fully adaptive strategies were achieved, respectively. In variation-acceptable criterion, 92 % of LoRP plans and 74 % of conventional couch shift plans were achieved. LoRP demonstrated 94 % target coverage (100 % prescription dose) in the fully adaptive strategy compared with 91 % in conventional couch shift strategy. The fully adaptive strategy had the best performance in sparing the intestine and colon. LoRP reduced the treatment session duration by more than a third (>20 min) compared with the fully adaptive strategy. Conclusion: LoRP achieved adequate target coverage with a short treatment session duration, potentially increasing treatment efficiency and improving patient comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.