ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2024
Can laparoscopic common bile duct exploration be performed without any drainage? A propensity score-matched study.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is considered a safe and effective method for treating choledocholithiasis, the absence of any biliary or abdominal drainage during surgery remains controversial.
aimThis paper aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of LCBDE without drainage, particularly abdominal drainage. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective analysis included 499 patients who underwent LCBDE with primary closure of the common bile duct and without any kind of biliary drainage during surgery. In 322 individuals, the surgery involved routine abdominal drainage (drainage group), whereas in 177 cases, no abdominal drainage was performed (nondrainage group). Baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were compared, followed by propensity score matching (PSM) to balance confounding factors. We compared effect indicators and complication rates between both groups.
resultsAfter PSM, each group included 124 patients. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of overall and individual complication rates, except for a lower incidence of hyperamylasemia in the nondrainage group. The surgery time, duration of postoperative antibiotic use, and the total and postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the nondrainage group. Similarly, the total hospitalization cost and postoperative usage of analgesics and antispasmodics were also considerably lower in the nondrainage group.
conclusionsNondrainage LCBDE is associated with shorter recovery time and better patient outcomes, as compared with procedures involving abdominal drainage. In suitable cases, this approach is completely safe and feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.