ReviewWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2024
Development of therapeutic digestive endoscopy robots: a narrative review.
Review in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric mapping of robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: research trends, collaboration networks, and emerging themes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Visualizing the development of robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a comprehensive bibliometric study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWith the continuous development of science and technology, robotics technology has gradually penetrated into various fields of application. In medicine, it is widely used in surgery to improve procedural accuracy and patient safety.
aimThis paper aims to explore the application of robotics in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and to summarize the principles, techniques, advantages, and limitations of robot-assisted procedures. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive search of the PubMed database and was conducted since the database inception until March 2024. We performed the search using subject headings and key words to obtain relevant articles focused on the application of robotic systems in ESD.
resultsA total of 21 studies describing 9 robotic systems were found eligible. The systems were categorized into one-type endoscopic robots and integrated endoscopic robots, and individual systems were reviewed and compared in a narrative form.
conclusionsRobotics technology has essential application value and development potential in ESD. Improving the accuracy and stability of the robotic arm, reducing its cost, and broadening its applica tion are the key challenges faced by this continuously advancing technology. It is necessary to further strengthen technology research, development, innovation, and interdisciplinary cooperation to promote the use and advancement of robotics technology in ESD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.