ArticleAEM education and training2025
Design and implementation of an automated patient-care dashboard to provide individualized patient care data and quality metrics to emergency medicine residents.
Article in AEM education and training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Procedural Skills and Emergency Medicine Common Program Requirements: It's Time to Address Skill Decay.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Design and implementation of an automated patient-care dashboard to provide individualized patient care data and quality metrics to emergency medicine residents.AEM education and training · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The emergency department (ED) is a high-stakes training environment for emergency medicine (EM) residents and residents' ability to reflect and self-evaluate patient care is of critical importance. Patient care dashboards have been shown to increase adherence to quality guidelines and improve patient outcomes. The objectives of this study were: (1) to create a comprehensive list of evidence-based, psychologically safe patient care and quality metrics to include in a patient care dashboard for EM residents; (2) to design an EM patient care residency dashboard in a secure, cloud-based environment integrated with the electronic health record (EHR); and (3) to pilot the usability and acceptability of the dashboard among EM residents. Methods: We created a list of potential EM resident patient care metrics using ACGME Emergency Medicine Defined Key Index Procedure Minimums, leading EM quality indicators, and current EM dashboard literature. We surveyed PGY-1 to -4 EM residents at a single residency program for their recommendations about inclusion, exclusion, and the psychological safety of each metric. We then developed a dashboard utilizing Power BI software integrated with Epic EHR. After development, we conducted a 2-month pilot evaluation for usability and acceptability among EM residents utilizing a mixed-methods approach. Results: We identified 41 metrics within five domains (productivity metrics, patient safety and leading quality indicators, key procedures, complex/high-acuity cases, and uncertain diagnosis) to consider for inclusion in the dashboard. Residents ( Conclusions: Our dashboard provides individualized patient care data to EM residents related to productivity, patient safety and quality, key procedures, complex/high-acuity cases, and uncertain diagnoses. A pilot group of EM residents found the dashboard acceptable and useable. Continued research is needed to explore ideal implementation and integration of patient care dashboards in residency training.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.