ArticleAEM education and training2025
Sono-starters: A qualitative study of pioneers in the field of point-of-care ultrasound.
Article in AEM education and training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sono-starters: A qualitative study of pioneers in the field of point-of-care ultrasound.AEM education and training · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) within emergency medicine (EM) was a new field that has since developed into a robust discipline through the efforts of early EM POCUS pioneers. This study explored the experiences that led to POCUS pioneers' success. These data can inform emerging fields of study including non-EM specialties adopting POCUS as well as other new subspecialties within medicine. Methods: This was a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with physician pioneers in the field of EM POCUS. EM POCUS pioneers were defined as early key contributors to the field of EM POCUS and were identified using combined author networks and purposive, stratified sampling with a snowball sampling technique. A thematic analysis of interviews was performed using a modified grounded theory approach with a constructivist-interpretivist paradigm. Results: Twelve physicians were interviewed in this study. We identified four major themes: career motivators, barriers encountered, promoters of success, and advancement of the field. Career motivators included the need for representation and the ability to impact a new and growing field. Barriers encountered included discouragement by other colleagues, political battles, lack of funding, and rudimentary technology. Participants felt their career success was attributed to guidance from mentors, demonstration of initiative, work ethic, and skills in active listening. Participants felt the field advanced through the creation of national organizations, publication of training and credentialing guidelines, generation of research, and investment into the next generation of POCUS leaders. Conclusions: This study identified several key themes in EM POCUS pioneers' careers including motivators, barriers, and methods used to overcome obstacles. Based on these data, we recommend a comprehensive set of strategies to support the advancement of an emerging field. These include early content exposure, mentorship, funding, research and industry collaboration, diversity, national organization involvement, and investment into future leaders.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.