ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025
Amorphous Roxithromycin Loaded in-situ Gel for the Treatment of
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Upper respiratory tract infections are among the most prevalent respiratory diseases, imposing both financial and physical burdens on affected individuals. Roxithromycin (ROX), a primary drug for treating bacterial-induced respiratory tract infections, is typically administered orally due to its hydrophobic nature. However, the non-specific distribution resulting from oral administration reduces bioavailability and can cause side effects such as diarrhea. Methods: In this study, we prepared a thermo-sensitive in-situ gel using a facile and highly reproducible method by simply mixing two types of poloxamers with ROX. Results: The ROX can be well dissolved in the poloxamer matrix in amorphous state to give solution. Upon intranasal administration, the ROX solution undergoes a phase transition to form in-situ gel under body temperature. This gel remains in the nasal cavity for an extended period, releasing the drug directly to the site of infection and minimizing non-specific distribution. Pharmacokinetic experiments revealed that, compared to oral administration, the bioavailability of local nasal administration increased by 1.5 times, and the drug concentration in the local nasal cavity increased by 8 times. In contrast, concentrations in the liver and small intestine did not significantly differ from those following oral administration. In vivo antibacterial experiments also showed that the ROX in-situ gel has superior antibacterial efficacy and excellent biocompatibility. Conclusion: These results suggest that the thermo-sensitive ROX in-situ gel is a promising formulation for treating bacterial upper respiratory tract infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.