ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Placing the transtibial centralisation stitch at the posterior horn of the medial meniscus best restores tibiofemoral contact mechanics and extrusion following medial meniscus posterior root tears: An in vitro biomechanical study using porcine knee joints.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Placing the transtibial centralisation stitch at the posterior horn of the medial meniscus best restores tibiofemoral contact mechanics and extrusion following medial meniscus posterior root tears: An in vitro biomechanical study using porcine knee joints.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Meniscus extrusion after a medial meniscus root repair: Where we are and how can we solve it?Science progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether the position of the transtibial centralisation tunnel, on the background of an anatomical transtibial pull-through root repair (ATPR), affects the tibiofemoral contact mechanics and meniscal extrusion for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). Methods: Meniscal extrusion and contact mechanics were measured using two-dimensional imaging and pressure films in 10 porcine knee joints. The posterior root was tested under six states: (1) intact; (2) MMPRT; (3) ATPR; (4) ATPR with TTC at the posterior horn (TTC-PH); (5) ATPR with TTC midway between the PH and posterior border of medial collateral ligament (MCL) (TTC-MID) and (6) ATPR with TTC behind the MCL (TTC-MCL). The testing protocol loaded knees with 200-N axial compression at four flexion angles (30°, 45°, 60° and 90°). At each angle and state, meniscal extrusion was measured as the difference in its position under load to that of the unloaded condition in the intact state. Contact area and pressure were recorded for all states at all angles and were analysed using a MATLAB programme. Results: ATPR + TTC-PH led to greater reduction in extrusion compared to both ATPR and ATPR + TTC-MCL at 60° and 90° ( Conclusion: Combining ATPR with TTC-PH provides the most appropriate biomechanical properties in reducing extrusion and improving contact mechanics following a MMPRT in porcine knees. Level of Evidence: Not applicable (laboratory study).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.