Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40123681›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Placing the transtibial centralisation stitch at the posterior horn of the medial meniscus best restores tibiofemoral contact mechanics and extrusion following medial meniscus posterior root tears: An in vitro biomechanical study using porcine knee joints.

Khalis Boksh, Duncan E T Shepherd, Daniel M Espino, Arijit Ghosh, Randeep Aujla, Michael E Hantes, Tarek Boutefnouchet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Khalis BokshDepartment of Biomedical Engineering University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3261-0359
Duncan E T ShepherdDepartment of Biomedical Engineering University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.
Daniel M EspinoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.
Arijit GhoshLeicester Academic Knee Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Leicester UK.
Randeep AujlaLeicester Academic Knee Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Leicester UK.
Michael E HantesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Trauma, University Hospitals of Larissa University of Thessaly Larissa Greece.
Tarek BoutefnouchetDepartment of Biomedical Engineering University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether the position of the transtibial centralisation tunnel, on the background of an anatomical transtibial pull-through root repair (ATPR), affects the tibiofemoral contact mechanics and meniscal extrusion for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). Methods: Meniscal extrusion and contact mechanics were measured using two-dimensional imaging and pressure films in 10 porcine knee joints. The posterior root was tested under six states: (1) intact; (2) MMPRT; (3) ATPR; (4) ATPR with TTC at the posterior horn (TTC-PH); (5) ATPR with TTC midway between the PH and posterior border of medial collateral ligament (MCL) (TTC-MID) and (6) ATPR with TTC behind the MCL (TTC-MCL). The testing protocol loaded knees with 200-N axial compression at four flexion angles (30°, 45°, 60° and 90°). At each angle and state, meniscal extrusion was measured as the difference in its position under load to that of the unloaded condition in the intact state. Contact area and pressure were recorded for all states at all angles and were analysed using a MATLAB programme. Results: ATPR + TTC-PH led to greater reduction in extrusion compared to both ATPR and ATPR + TTC-MCL at 60° and 90° ( Conclusion: Combining ATPR with TTC-PH provides the most appropriate biomechanical properties in reducing extrusion and improving contact mechanics following a MMPRT in porcine knees. Level of Evidence: Not applicable (laboratory study).

Indexed as

augmentationbiomechanicsextrusionmeniscusrepair

Identifiers

PMID40123681
PMCPMC11928889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.