ArticleIndian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB2025
A New Machine Learning Approach for Actual Calcium Measurement.
Article in Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Metabolic Syndrome-Kidney Stone Disease Comorbidity: The Role of Dietary Micronutrients.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- Ensemble neural network modelling for stratified HbA1c prediction: Integrating past glucose measurement as a predictor of glycaemic control.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ionized calcium is a better measure but still many healthcare setups use total calcium to determine the calcium status due to wider availability on major clinical chemistry automated platforms. The performance of calcium correction formulas varies in different populations, limiting their wider use. Machine learning models can study multiple variables with their complex interactions, hence predict actual calcium more accurately. The present study evaluated the performance of Random forest and XGBoost machine learning models and compared it with the conventional corrected calcium calculation formulas, in eastern Indian population. The total calcium, ionized calcium, total protein and albumin were performed in the clinical biochemistry laboratory of AIIMS Bhubaneswar 2022, a total of 894 samples were included. Results of such parameters were collected from the laboratory database. A 65-15-20 partitioning was done for training, validation and testing of the machine learning models respectively. Performance of models was evaluated in comparison to best six corrected calcium calculating formulas. Calcium predicted by XGBoost model showed least deviation and strong correlation with actual calcium value (r = 0.707). XGBoost model performed superior to the existing and clinically used corrected calcium calculating formulas in our study population. When compared in hypoalbuminemia population also, XG Boost model outperformed other formulas. Machine learning model XGBoost can be used to predict actual total calcium with more accuracy comparing to conventional corrected calcium calculation formulas in case of non-availability of ionized calcium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.