ArticleTransportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour2025
Examination of Naturalistic Driving Behavior and Risk Events Across Concussion Recovery.
Article in Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Driving simulator studies show that individuals with acute concussion present notable alterations in driving performance and perform better as recovery progresses. Although driving simulators create a safe environment and are capable of immersing individuals in realistic driving scenarios, they fail to capture daily naturalistic driving behavior throughout concussion recovery. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to assess the feasibility of collecting naturalistic driving and explore driving behaviors and risk events in individuals with concussion, relative to the control group. Twelve individuals with concussion and 17 non-concussed controls installed a GPS sensor in their personal vehicle for a 14-day period. We compared driving behavior (total distance driven, total duration driven, average speed, and number of trips taken per day) and risk events (number of hard brakings and sudden accelerations) captured between groups. Hedge's g and linear mixed regression models were used to compare driving behavior and risk events. Individuals with concussion appeared to drive less and slower prior to day 3 post-concussion but displayed similar driving behavior after day 3 of post-concussion, relative to the control group. Additionally, we observed a pattern that the concussion group drove slower than the control group across concussion recovery. Our study provides preliminary evidence that suggests a need for a return to driving strategy to ensure the safety of individuals with concussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.